Chess Listings
This Listings page contains the basic voting analysis on the question:
Are the wishes and preferences of the member clubs and
individuals being adopted & elected as determined ?
Summary of the NZCF AGM & SGM determinable open public
results of the contested remit-ideas & Candidacy elections from 2018+.
For full context (all entities are of good character)
refer to the Openness page containing the:
* NZCF AGM & SGM minutes:
westernbopchess.weebly.com/openness.html
and also view in full context the following pages:
* The Contended voting chart here.
* The Restoration page here.with the easy and basic concept solutions.
----------------------------------
Publicly Determinable 'Results' Summary
(or public results determined as undeterminable):
(listed from most recent NZCF meeting to oldest)
Are the wishes and preferences of the member clubs and
individuals being adopted & elected as determined ?
Summary of the NZCF AGM & SGM determinable open public
results of the contested remit-ideas & Candidacy elections from 2018+.
For full context (all entities are of good character)
refer to the Openness page containing the:
* NZCF AGM & SGM minutes:
westernbopchess.weebly.com/openness.html
and also view in full context the following pages:
* The Contended voting chart here.
* The Restoration page here.with the easy and basic concept solutions.
----------------------------------
Publicly Determinable 'Results' Summary
(or public results determined as undeterminable):
(listed from most recent NZCF meeting to oldest)
2026 AGM June 21
(Location: Online) Minutes yet to be accepted.
- Four contested remit-policy results aligned with the
majority representation of individuals nationwide.
- In a contest, All five contested Candidacy results: that of being the successful and/or unsuccessful candidates in a multi-member election, correct voting system STV determines it as Undeterminable. in this: five candidates contesting a multi-member election of three places. STV voting wasn't used (or proportional representation used in weightings either.)
- One contested Candidacy result: that of being the
unsuccessful candidate in a multi-member election, the opposite to the wishes of the revelant chess clubs. in this: three candidates
contesting a multi-member election of two places. STV voting wasn't used,
(or proportional representation used in weightings either.)
(Location: Online) Minutes yet to be accepted.
- Four contested remit-policy results aligned with the
majority representation of individuals nationwide.
- In a contest, All five contested Candidacy results: that of being the successful and/or unsuccessful candidates in a multi-member election, correct voting system STV determines it as Undeterminable. in this: five candidates contesting a multi-member election of three places. STV voting wasn't used (or proportional representation used in weightings either.)
- One contested Candidacy result: that of being the
unsuccessful candidate in a multi-member election, the opposite to the wishes of the revelant chess clubs. in this: three candidates
contesting a multi-member election of two places. STV voting wasn't used,
(or proportional representation used in weightings either.)
2025 SGM October 19
- One contested remit-policy result opposite to the
majority representation of individuals nationwide.
- Two contested remit-policy results aligned with the
majority representation of individuals nationwide.
Ref: 2025 October19 SGM Minutes here.
--------------------------------------------
- One contested remit-policy result opposite to the
majority representation of individuals nationwide.
- Two contested remit-policy results aligned with the
majority representation of individuals nationwide.
Ref: 2025 October19 SGM Minutes here.
--------------------------------------------
2025 AGM March 30
(Location: Online)
- Six contested remit-policy results opposite to the
majority representation of individuals nationwide.
- Seven contested results aligned with the
majority representation of individuals nationwide.
- One contested Candidacy result opposite to the majority
representation of individuals nationwide, AND opposite to
representation of ALL relevant individuals locally, AND
opposite to representation of ALL five relevant local
chess clubs. Outsider clubs were allowed to vote and
proportional representation NOT used either.
- One contested Candidacy result: that of being the
unsuccessful candidate in a multi-member election,
the opposite to the majority representation of individuals
nationwide, AND opposite to the majority representation
of relevant individuals locally, in this: five candidates
contesting a multi-member election of four places.
Easily determined that the candidate who was 'unsuccessful' was one of
the four preferred candidates, but undeterminable who was the least preferred
candidate of the five. (The correct method for multi-member elections -
STV voting wasn't used, or proportional representation used in the
weightings either)
Ref: 2025 March30 AGM Minutes here.
--------------------------------------------
(Location: Online)
- Six contested remit-policy results opposite to the
majority representation of individuals nationwide.
- Seven contested results aligned with the
majority representation of individuals nationwide.
- One contested Candidacy result opposite to the majority
representation of individuals nationwide, AND opposite to
representation of ALL relevant individuals locally, AND
opposite to representation of ALL five relevant local
chess clubs. Outsider clubs were allowed to vote and
proportional representation NOT used either.
- One contested Candidacy result: that of being the
unsuccessful candidate in a multi-member election,
the opposite to the majority representation of individuals
nationwide, AND opposite to the majority representation
of relevant individuals locally, in this: five candidates
contesting a multi-member election of four places.
Easily determined that the candidate who was 'unsuccessful' was one of
the four preferred candidates, but undeterminable who was the least preferred
candidate of the five. (The correct method for multi-member elections -
STV voting wasn't used, or proportional representation used in the
weightings either)
Ref: 2025 March30 AGM Minutes here.
--------------------------------------------
2024 AGM March 24
(Location: Online)
- Two contested remit-policy results aligned with the
majority representation of individuals nationwide.
- Three contested remit-policy results opposite to the
majority representation of individuals nationwide.
Ref: 2024 March24 AGM Minutes here.
--------------------------------------------
(Location: Online)
- Two contested remit-policy results aligned with the
majority representation of individuals nationwide.
- Three contested remit-policy results opposite to the
majority representation of individuals nationwide.
Ref: 2024 March24 AGM Minutes here.
--------------------------------------------
2023 AGM January 11
(Location: Wellington)
- Two contested remit-policy results aligned with the
majority representation of individuals nationwide.
Ref: 2023 January11 AGM Minutes here.
--------------------------------------------
(Location: Wellington)
- Two contested remit-policy results aligned with the
majority representation of individuals nationwide.
Ref: 2023 January11 AGM Minutes here.
--------------------------------------------
2022 AGM January 11
(Location: Christchurch)
- Two contested remit-policy results aligned with the
majority representation of individuals nationwide.
Ref: 2022 January11 AGM Minutes here.
--------------------------------------------
(Location: Christchurch)
- Two contested remit-policy results aligned with the
majority representation of individuals nationwide.
Ref: 2022 January11 AGM Minutes here.
--------------------------------------------
2018 AGM
January 03
(Location: Palmerston North)
- Two contested remit-policy voting results in error.
Optional correcting of irregularities and the results declined.
Ref: Contended voting chart here
--------------------------------------------
January 03
(Location: Palmerston North)
- Two contested remit-policy voting results in error.
Optional correcting of irregularities and the results declined.
Ref: Contended voting chart here
--------------------------------------------
